[1] Cf. BALZER, Untersuchungen, p. 709.
[2] The fuzzy term “Steinerne Brücke” or “stone bridge” is used for several Paderborn bridges in the written tradition of the Paderborn fieldmark. In the 15th and 16th centuries, the “pons lapideus” is also referred to as “Schafbrücke”, and in the new survey of the “Fürstengärten” of 1743, again simply as “Steinbrücke”. In the 19th and 20th centuries, the term “island bridge” is also found, which led the Fürstenweg east past the spa and baths. What is meant in all cases is the massive, two-arched structure that led today’s Fürstenweg in a north-south direction across the Pader. Cf. BALZER, Manfred: Zum Verhältnis von Stadtlandwehr und Stadtgebiet. Das Beispiel Paderborn, in: WZ 163 (2013), pp. 183-220, here pp. 204f., notes 93-98. A drawing of the “Stone Bridge” can be found, among others, in a veduta next to the “Water Gate” of the Pader, made by Johann Conrad Schlaun in 1719. A simple side profile of this bridge, which no longer exists today, is also attached to Paderborn’s application for the construction of a water intake at the “Inselbrücke” (island bridge) from June 1931. Cf. StadtA Pb, A 5551, unfol.
[3] Mentioned in the episcopal feudal deeds are the “Niendik”, “Borgdik”, “Galgenmolendik”, Tegeldik”, “Middeldik”, “Blankendik” and “Overstadesdik”. Cited in BALZER, Untersuchungen, p. 710.
[4] LA Detmold, M 5 C, No. 1469, “Tarif der steuerbaren Reinerträgen der Gemeinde Neuhaus,” lfd. No. 42 and 43.
[5] Cf. EAB Pb, AV Acta 88, “Aufmessungen […] des Stadts Teich”, fol. 32r.